If the parties have chosen to apply the Japanese safeguards provisions, the recommended amending provisions for the ISDA Euroclear Collateral Transfer Agreement (2018) and the ISDA Euroclear Security Agreement (2018) with respect to Japanese collateral will apply. In addition, the Japanese provisions on security providers (GIs) of the Euroclear ISDA 2019 security agreement allow parties to protect securities agreements with interests in securities under the amendment of the Law on Clearing at the Closing of Certain Financial Transactions by Financial Institutions (the “Clearing Law”), effective May 31, 2019 and effective May 1, 2020 (the “Amendment”), for use. As a result of the implementation of the amendment, security agreements are now recognized and protected in the reorganization proceedings of a Japanese creditor (prior to this implementation, only collateral arrangements for the transfer of securities under the Netting Act were recognized). ISDA`s EUROclear 2019 Collateral Transfer Agreement and ISDA`s Euroclear Security Agreement 2019 are used to document a guarantee agreement between two parties when the collateral is held in a Euroclear account in order to meet initial margin requirements. The documents can be used in conjunction with Euroclear`s MultiSeg service, which holds the pledged assets in clear legally separate subdivisions of the pledged account, as well as with the traditional special separate account structure mentioned in previous versions of these documents. The applicable law of the collateral transfer agreement does not correspond to the applicable law of the underlying ISDA framework agreement. Parties applying an ISDA Framework Agreement under French law should include the “Recommended Amendment Provisions for ISDA Euroclear CTA to be used under the French Law ISDA Framework Agreement”, which are provided as a stand-alone document. The following documents are used to document a guarantee agreement between two parties when the guarantee is held in a bank deposit account to meet the initial margin requirements. These documents have been prepared to enable the parties to apply a law applicable to the mechanical aspects of the warranty relationship and another law applicable to the granting and performance of the warranty through the separate account or warranty. The form of security agreements provided is governed by English, New York, Luxembourg, Belgian, French, Irish or Korean law and has been developed as an example of security agreements. The applicable law of the collateral transfer agreement does not correspond to the applicable law of the underlying ISDA framework agreement. Parties applying an ISDA Framework Agreement under French law should include the “Recommended Modification Provisions for the OTC on the ISDA Bank Depositary for Use with French IsDA Master Agreement Law”, which is provided as a stand-alone document.

Parties applying the Agreement on Security Rights under Korean law should include the recommended amending provisions for KRW (IM) guarantees in the ADDENDUM on KRW (IM) guarantees for use with the ISDA OTC on bank custodians, which is provided as a stand-alone document. Clearstream ISDA documents are used to document a collateral agreement between two parties when the security is held in a Clearstream account to meet initial margin requirements. There are two versions of the 2019 backup contract, one to be used when the Clearstream warranty account is in the name of the security provider, and the other to be used when the Clearstream security account is in the name of the security taker. The latter version should be used if the parties wish to adopt the recommended amendment provisions to the CLEARSTREAM ISDA 2017 security agreement with respect to Japanese warranties (“shichiks”), which are provided as stand-alone documents and also included as a choice as they are intended for later use with the 2019 versions of Clearstream. The 2019 versions of these documents have been updated to reflect changes to ISDA 2018 Credit Support Annex For Initial Margin (IM) (Security Interest – New York Law) and Credit Support Deed For Initial Margin (IM) (Security Interest – English Law) 2018 published in September 2018. The applicable law of the collateral transfer agreement does not correspond to the applicable law of the underlying ISDA framework agreement. Parties using an ISDA Framework Agreement under French law should include the “Recommended Modification Provisions for the ISDA Clearstream CTA for Use with French Right ISDA Master Agreement”, which is provided as a stand-alone document. The 2016 version of the security agreement is intended for use when the Clearstream warranty account is in the name of the security provider.

The 2017 version of the Warranty Agreement is designed for use in cases where the Clearstream Warranty Account is in the name of the security holder, and this version is to be used if the parties intend to use the recommended modification provisions for Japanese Warranties (“Shichiken”). These can be used with one of the two versions of the warranty transfer agreement. The Novation Agreement was prepared to allow the parties to move from the 2016 version of the Safeguards Agreement to the 2017 version. The “Euroclear Combined Platform and Third Party Custodian – Bilateral Addendum” allows the parties to make certain technical changes in the “Additional Terms” section of paragraph 13 of a CSD, CSA or CTA to activate the Euroclear Collateral Portfolio Service, a hybrid offering that allows the reservation of collateral with any third-party custodian with certain additional tripartite features provided by Euroclear. Annotated versions of ISDA 2019 Bank Custodian Collateral Transfer Agreement for Initial Margin (IM) and ISDA 2019 Luxembourg Law Security Agreement for Initial Margin (IM) are also included and include descriptions and explanations of the impact of each of the joint choices that can be made in the documents. . . .